[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A-minima, and R vrs S-16
Eclair ACL Discussion and Support
--------------------------- ListBot Sponsor --------------------------
Get a low APR NextCard Visa in 30 seconds!
1. Fill in the brief application
2. Receive approval decision within 30 seconds
3. Get rates as low as 2.99% Intro or 9.99% Ongoing APR and no
annual fee!
Apply NOW!
http://www.bcentral.com/listbot/NextCard
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I would guess that the A-minima is probably meant to keep folks that are
currently doing higher budget TV-type work in Super-16 from switching to
video (because there are prototype HDTV cameras that are as about small as
camcorders; they were used in making the movie "TIMECODE" --- the A-minima
would theoretically take away that size advantage). I don't think that the
A-minima is intended for low-budget filmmakers who are torn between whether
to spend $3,000 vrs $5,000 on their 30 year-old equipment purchase. I'm
certain that it is aimed squarely at keeping Super-16 alive in the high end
as a "B" camera for hand-held use; In effect, it protects the $50,000 Aaton
for a while.
I've blown up to 35mm from Regular-16 and from Super-16. There is absolutely
no comparison. It isn't merely a matter of "a little more shapness." It is
the difference between something that looks excellent versus something that
looks inferior. The extra 46% image area makes all the difference in the
world. It will be equally important in HDTV.
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to EclairACL-unsubscribe@listbot.com