From: Marc Syp <mpsyp@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: EclairACL@topica.com
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:12:44
To: EclairACL@topica.com
Subject: Re: Eclair ACL zoom lenses vs. primes ... the Angenieux 12-120
P.S. Julian:
I re-read your reply and saw that you referred to the 10-150 T/2.3 as a
ZEISS. I am actually talking about the ANGENIEUX. Don't know if it was a
misread or a mistype. :)
Marc S.
From: Marc Syp <mpsyp@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: EclairACL@topica.com
To: EclairACL@topica.com
Subject: Re: Eclair ACL zoom lenses vs. primes ... the Angenieux 12-120
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:06:52
I will of course report to the group on my findings but I will say up front
that I don't have a ton of comparison experience. I've only done one
serious
project (a PSA media campaign for TV) and I shot the whole thing on a
crystal-synced R16 with c-mount lenses. Mostly Angies (12-120, 25/.95) but
also some switars (10mm) and assorted low-light cheapies (Computar
12.5-75/1.2). I was acutally very suprised by the quality of the Computar,
I
thought it was going to be utter garbage. But then I've never shot with
zeiss superspeeds or cooke primes, so you all probably think these lenses
eat dirt. :) Anyway, I probably won't be shooting anything soon with my
10-150 (for my new ACL), but when I do I'll let you know what I think.
Marc S.
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com