[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Eclair ACL zoom lenses vs. primes ... the Angenieux 12-120

P.S. Julian:

I re-read your reply and saw that you referred to the 10-150 T/2.3 as a ZEISS. I am actually talking about the ANGENIEUX. Don't know if it was a misread or a mistype. :)

Marc S.

From: Marc Syp <mpsyp@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: EclairACL@topica.com
To: EclairACL@topica.com
Subject: Re: Eclair ACL zoom lenses vs. primes ... the Angenieux 12-120
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:06:52

I will of course report to the group on my findings but I will say up front
that I don't have a ton of comparison experience. I've only done one serious
project (a PSA media campaign for TV) and I shot the whole thing on a
crystal-synced R16 with c-mount lenses. Mostly Angies (12-120, 25/.95) but
also some switars (10mm) and assorted low-light cheapies (Computar
12.5-75/1.2). I was acutally very suprised by the quality of the Computar, I
thought it was going to be utter garbage.  But then I've never shot with
zeiss superspeeds or cooke primes, so you all probably think these lenses
eat dirt. :)   Anyway, I probably won't be shooting anything soon with my
10-150 (for my new ACL), but when I do I'll let you know what I think.

Marc S.

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

This email was sent to: elroro@propagandaindustries.org

EASY UNSUBSCRIBE click here: http://topica.com/u/?a84xYK.a9svPI
Or send an email to: EclairACL-unsubscribe@topica.com

T O P I C A -- Register now to manage your mail!